【Topic】The Complex Relationship between Corporations, Conflict Prevention, & Conflict Resolution
【Lecturer】Prof. Molly M. Melin
【Time】21:00 p.m., April 21, 2022 (GMT +8)
【Online registration Fee】Complimentary for faculty/students from SMXMU
【Online link】Zoom, 873 0852 4578,
https://us02web.zoom.us/w/87308524578?tk=i9b6PljZ_8EVEISkXaisWHPXlj4rdOzqOnNu-9nEkj0.DQMAAAAUU_5cIhZucWRBNWNPRVJNVzFSNjE5NG1kN0tRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
【Requirement】Participants shall scan the QR Code before April 18, 2022
|
Bio: Molly M. Melin is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at Loyola University Chicago (USA). She received her Ph.D. from the University of California at Davis in 2008.
|
Content: Private corporations are rarely discussed as playing a role in efforts to curb civil violence, even though they often have strong interests in maintaining stability. Violence often damages key infrastructure or directly targets companies. Corporations also have a normative obligation to conduct business in ways that promote peace. While there are historical examples of firm-instigated violence and firms benefiting from instability and conflict, there is also evidence that corporations proactively engage in peacebuilding. For example, firms devise programs to promote economic development, offer access to education, and employ former combatants.
Dr. Melin develops a theory of the conflicting roles corporations play in building and preventing peace. Dr. Melin shows that corporations engage in peacebuilding when the government lacks the capacity to do so, but they also weigh the opportunity costs of acting. Firms are uniquely able to raise the cost of violence, and proactive firms increase peace in a country. At the same time, an active private sector can make it harder for states with an ongoing conflict to reach an agreement by complicating the bargaining process.
Including original cross-national data of peacebuilding efforts and in-depth case analyses of corporate actions and outcomes, Dr. Melin shows that corporations help to prevent violence but not resolve it. In examining the corporate motives for peacebuilding and the implications of these activities for preventing violence and conflict resolution, the book builds a more holistic picture of the peace and conflict process. The findings also help explain why armed civil conflicts persist despite the multitude of diverse actors working to end them.
International Development and Accreditation Office,
School of Management, Xiamen University
